Reply to Craig A. Cooney

A Reply to Craig Swan

Be Careful What You Wish For: A Reply to Craig

Recently William Lane Craig (2000, 2001) has attempted to resuscitate an argument, originally given by George Schlesinger (1980), against the tenseless or B-theory of time, according to which the only intrinsically temporal entities are the temporal relations of earlier ⁄ later than and simultaneity. According to Craig, the objective reality of temporal becoming—the passage of time or events in...

REPLY Reply to Comment on ‘ Bennett clocking of quantum - dot cellular automata and the limits to binary logic scaling ’ Craig

It is shown that a number of claims in the subject paper are incorrect and/or misleading. In the paper by Lent et al [1], the authors make certain claims about our work [2, 3] to which we feel compelled to respond. Unfortunately, we believe that Lent et al, in section 6 (pages 4248–50) have misinterpreted and misunderstood our analyses of physical limits for binary switching. We would like to c...

Artificial hydration and alimentation at the end of life: a reply to Craig.

Dr Gillian Craig (1) has argued that palliative medicine services have tended to adopt a policy of sedation without hydration, which under certain circumstances may be medically inappropriate, causative of death and distressing to family and friends. We welcome this opportunity to defend, with an important modification, the approach we proposed without substantive background argument in our ori...

A Problem in Avicennas View on the Origination of the Soul and a Reply to It